🌿 Zion vs. Institutions — The Difference Matters
🌿 Zion vs. Institutions — The Difference Matters
After a door cracks open, a question quietly follows:
If something is wrong… what was it supposed to look like?
This is where confusion often sets in.
Some people think the answer is another institution.
Others think it means walking away from everything.
But scripture offers a third way.
🏛️ Institutions Are Tools — Until They Become the Point
Institutions aren’t evil by default.
They begin as tools:
to organize
to gather
to teach
to serve
But the Book of Mormon is remarkably consistent in its warning:
When a tool becomes the focus,
when preservation replaces conversion,
when authority replaces relationship,
the Spirit withdraws quietly.
“They have all gone astray save it be a few, who are the humble followers of Christ; nevertheless, they are led, that in many instances they do err because they are taught by the precepts of men.”
— Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi 28:14
The danger is subtle.
Most people inside institutions are sincere.
They love God.
They serve faithfully.
The drift happens above them, not because of them.
🌾 What Zion Is — And Is Not
Zion is not an institution.
Zion is a condition of the people.
Scripture defines it simply:
“The Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.”
Notice what’s missing:
No headquarters
No asset portfolio
No secrecy
No hierarchy guarding itself
Zion doesn’t grow by accumulation.
Zion grows by consecration.
🪶 What the Nemenhah Records Add
Where the Book of Mormon warns about corruption,
the Nemenhah Records describe how Zion actually functioned.
They speak plainly of the last days, warning that:
churches would multiply buildings
wealth would be stored “for security”
sacred authority would be claimed but not carried
the poor would remain while treasuries grew
And then they contrast that with something radically different:
• Open stewardship, not hidden accounts
• Councils instead of centralized rulers
• Mothers safeguarding community welfare
• Leaders who served temporarily, then returned to the people
• Sacred spaces that remained open, not restricted
• Records kept for the people, not controlled over them
In short:
Zion was relational, not institutional.
🔍 Why Institutions Struggle to Become Zion
Institutions naturally seek:
stability
predictability
protection
continuity
Zion requires:
trust
humility
transparency
listening to God now
Institutions ask:
“How do we preserve what we’ve built?”
Zion asks:
“How do we love who is here?”
Those two questions eventually pull in opposite directions.
🚶 From Belonging to Walking
This is the heart of it.
Institutions offer belonging.
Zion offers becoming.
Belonging says:
“Stay. Support. Don’t question too much.”
Becoming says:
“Come. Listen. Follow.”
Jesus did not invite people into a system.
He invited them into a walk.
🕊️ Why This Isn’t an Attack on the Church
This matters deeply.
Zion thinking does not despise institutions.
It simply refuses to confuse them with salvation.
Many of God’s most faithful people are still inside institutions.
They are not blind.
They are not weak.
They are not deceived fools.
Often, they are simply patient.
And the Lord is patient with them.
🌱 A Quiet Test You Can Use
Here’s a simple discernment question, free of accusation:
Does this structure help me hear Jesus more clearly — or help me hear Him less?
No arguing required.
No labels needed.
Just honesty.
🕯️ Final Thought
The Book of Mormon wakes us up to institutional drift.
The Nemenhah Records remind us what Zion actually looked like.
And Jesus still says the same thing He always has:
“Follow me.”
Not follow the building.
Not follow the system.
Not follow the robe.
Follow the Voice.
Slowly.
Gently.
Together.
Comments