πΏ The New and Everlasting Covenant — A Quiet Remembering
πΏ The New and Everlasting Covenant — A Quiet Remembering
Hello friends.
It’s just the old man again…
sitting still long enough
to listen.
For a long time, I thought the New and Everlasting Covenant was something managed —
defined by forms,
protected by systems,
administered by permission.
But the longer I sit with Jesus,
the more I wonder if the covenant was never meant to be managed at all.
What if it was meant to be lived?
π️ Before There Was a World
Across the true records, there is a gentle agreement.
Light comes before the sun.
The Word comes before matter.
Relationship comes before structure.
In the Nemenhah Records, the New and Everlasting Covenant is spoken of as existing before the foundations of this earth — received in light, not flesh; entered by consent, not command.
This harmonizes quietly with the Bible, where the covenant is written on hearts, not stone.
It also echoes the Book of Mormon, which teaches that covenant life is about becoming sons and daughters of God — not maintaining religious credentials.
The covenant did not begin on earth.
Earth is not its birthplace.
Earth is its classroom.
π₯ Has the Covenant Ever Changed?
Here the Nemenhah voice is steady and calm:
The covenant itself has never changed.
What changes are:
languages
ceremonies
symbols
cultures
But the covenant remains what it has always been:
freely entered
rooted in love
sustained by consecrated living
preserved through listening to the Voice
When people fall away, the covenant is not rewritten.
They simply stop living it.
That truth doesn’t accuse.
It invites.
π Is This Covenant Only About Earth?
This question stopped me the first time I really considered it.
The Nemenhah Records do not treat the covenant as earth-exclusive.
They present it as inter-creational — the same living law governing all ordered creations where agency exists.
Earth is not special because God invented something new here.
Earth is special because we forgot something ancient.
The covenant did not fail.
We did.
π± “New” — But New to Whom?
I remember reading — and you may too — that the New and Everlasting Covenant was described as new in the universe.
Here’s the quiet clarification:
“New” does not mean newly created.
It means:
renewed after loss
restored after rebellion
remembered again by a forgetful people
The covenant is everlasting in origin,
yet always new in reception.
Every time a people awaken,
it feels new again.
π Where Confusion Crept In
Early passages in the Doctrine and Covenants speak beautifully of a living covenant — received by the voice of God, preserved through obedience, and lost through pride.
Over time, the covenant became narrowed:
tied to institutions
guarded by authority
reduced to systems
But the older voice never vanished.
It just got quieter.
The Nemenhah Records don’t replace other scripture.
They re-expand it — restoring the covenant to its original scale and spirit.
π️ So What Is the New and Everlasting Covenant?
Not paperwork.
Not ownership.
Not control.
It is this:
The eternal law of consecrated love by which God relates to His children — entered before creation, lived through love, remembered through obedience, and restored whenever a people return to the Light.
And here’s the simple test I keep returning to:
Does this draw us closer to Jesus?
If it does —
it’s real.
If it leads us away from Him —
no matter how official it sounds —
it isn’t.
__________________________________________________________________________________
πΏ The New and Everlasting Covenant — A Quiet Remembering (With Witness)
Hello friends.
It’s just me again…
sitting still long enough to listen.
For a long time, I thought the New and Everlasting Covenant was something administered —
defined by systems,
guarded by authority,
and accessed through permission.
But the longer I sit with Jesus,
the more I’m beginning to see something different.
Not something new…
Something older.
π️ Before There Was a World
Across multiple records, there is a consistent pattern:
The covenant did not begin on earth.
It began before it.
π Bible
“I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts…”
— Jeremiah 31:33
π Book of Mormon
“Behold, I say unto you, that ye must be born again…”
— Mosiah 27:25
π Doctrine & Covenants
“And this is the record… that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father…”
— D&C 93:16
π Nemenhah Records (paraphrased teaching pattern)
The covenant is received in light before it is lived in the flesh,
entered by consent,
and confirmed by the Haymehnay (Holy Spirit of Promise).
π Pattern across all:
- inward change
- divine relationship
- not institutional entry
The covenant begins with God and the soul — not a system.
π₯ Has the Covenant Ever Changed?
Scripturally, the answer is consistent:
π No.
π Bible
“Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever.”
— Hebrews 13:8
π Book of Mormon
“The Lord is the same yesterday, today, and forever.”
— 1 Nephi 10:18
π Doctrine & Covenants
“I the Lord am bound when ye do what I say…”
— D&C 82:10
π Nemenhah Teaching Pattern
The covenant remains,
while ceremonies, languages, and forms shift across generations.
π What changes:
- ordinances (forms)
- expressions (culture)
- administration (people)
π What does NOT change:
- love
- obedience to God’s voice
- consecration
- relationship with the Peacemaker
When people fall away…
The covenant isn’t altered.
It is simply no longer lived.
π Is This Covenant Only About Earth?
This is where things open up.
π Book of Mormon
“The Lord doth grant unto all nations… to teach his word.”
— Alma 29:8
π Doctrine & Covenants
“Worlds without number have I created…”
— Moses 1:33
π Nemenhah Records (teaching pattern)
The covenant is described as governing all ordered creation —
not just earth,
but all beings with agency.
π Meaning:
Earth is not where the covenant started.
Earth is where it is remembered again.
π± Why Is It Called “New”?
This part confused me for years.
But the scriptures actually explain it clearly.
π Doctrine & Covenants
“A new and an everlasting covenant…”
— D&C 22:1
π Book of Mormon
“Awake and arise… that ye may be redeemed…”
— Ether 8:24
π “New” does NOT mean newly created.
It means:
- restored after loss
- renewed after apostasy
- remembered again
The covenant is:
Everlasting in origin
But always new to those who rediscover it
π Where Confusion Entered
Over time…
Something subtle happened.
The covenant became:
- tied to institutions
- controlled by authority
- defined by participation
But earlier scripture points somewhere different:
π Doctrine & Covenants
“Receive the Holy Ghost… which is the promise…”
— D&C 45:57
π Joseph Smith (Teachings)
The Holy Spirit of Promise seals individuals unto eternal life.
π Nemenhah Records
The sealing is not institutional —
it is confirmed by the Haymehnay
through direct relationship with the Peacemaker.
π That’s a big shift:
From external validation
to internal sealing
π️ So What Is the Covenant — Really?
When all records are laid side by side…
A clear definition emerges:
π The New and Everlasting Covenant is:
The eternal relationship of love and obedience between God and His children —
entered by choice,
confirmed by the Spirit,
lived through consecration,
and sustained by hearing His voice.
π A Simple Test
I keep coming back to this:
π Moroni 7:13
“Whatsoever thing inviteth to do good, and to love God… is of God.”
So the test becomes simple:
π Does it bring me closer to Jesus?
If yes — it belongs to Him.
If no — it doesn’t matter how official it sounds.
πΏ A Quiet Closing
For me now…
This has become less about defining the covenant
and more about living it.
Walking with Him.
Listening.
Letting Him change me.
Maybe the covenant isn’t something to manage.
Maybe it’s something to remember.
And maybe…
what makes it everlasting
is that it never stops calling us back.
Comments
That’s not a small thing to go through.
I don’t pretend to understand all of it…
but I do believe the Lord works pretty personally with each of us.
Really appreciate you sharing that.
If you ever want to talk more, I’m around.
thetrueremnantblog@gmail.com
Two of the 5 translators are still alive. Timothy one of the 3 Nephites directed the translation process.
To me the records go further than the Book of Mormon in shedding how to build Zion. These records confirmed what the Book of Mormon warns the gentiles of. Love